I just finished reading the new Cybersecurity Amendment Bill, 2025, and the most dangerous thing about it is this: it isn’t truly about security, it’s about control.
Behind the legal jargon and “protection” narrative lies a worrying agenda. The Bill seeks to expand the powers of the Cyber Security Authority (CSA) far beyond regulation and safety into the realm of policing and prosecution.
Under the proposed amendments, the CSA would be able to:
• Enter and inspect private premises, search computers, and audit systems, with or without a warrant.
• Arrest and prosecute citizens directly, bypassing traditional law enforcement oversight.
• Freeze bank accounts and assets before a court even determines guilt.
• Compel individuals and businesses to surrender private information, including digital communications and personal data.
• Decide what constitutes “false information” online, effectively controlling speech and expression.
• Deny professionals the right to work unless they obtain “accreditation” under their system of control.
In essence, one unelected agency would have the power to:
1. Decide what you can or cannot say online.
2. Shut down your business for “non-compliance.”
3. Seize your property or freeze your accounts under the guise of an investigation.
4. Silence digital innovators, journalists, and civic voices by labeling them “unaccredited” or “non-compliant.”
This is digital authoritarianism dressed up as policy reform. It centralizes control of the internet, information flow, and economic activity in the hands of a single agency, without sufficient checks, oversight, or public accountability.
You cannot fight corruption, misinformation, or cyber threats by giving unchecked power to the same government that often fears transparency, innovation, and free speech.
Every dictatorship begins with the promise to “protect citizens from misinformation.” Then it evolves to protecting the State from criticism.
If this Bill passes in its current form, it will criminalize dissent, intimidate civic voices, and stifle innovation. It risks turning Ghana’s digital space into a monitored, censored environment where fear replaces freedom.
We need to talk about this, openly, and urgently.
Citizens, lawmakers, and civil society must debate, review, and amend this Bill before it becomes law. Because as it stands, it takes far more from us than it gives.
Security should empower citizens, not silence them.
